Polymarket's High-Stakes Gamble on US Invasion of Venezuela Leaves Bettors Frustrated
A dramatic shift in odds has left traders on online wager platform Polymarket reeling after the company declared that bets on a US invasion of Venezuela do not qualify for payout. Millions of dollars' worth of wagers have been placed, with many anticipating a swift resolution to the situation.
The bet, which was set at 31 January 2026, appeared to be a long shot, but one anonymous trader took a $30,000 gamble on Maduro's ousting by that date and walked away with a staggering profit of over $436,000. However, after President Trump's forces captured Maduro on Saturday morning, Polymarket clarified that the event did not meet their criteria for a winning bet.
As a result, odds on an invasion plummeted to below 5%. The platform claims that while President Trump mentioned "running" Venezuela, this does not constitute an invasion. However, traders on the site are crying foul, with one user expressing outrage at Polymarket's position, saying it is "sheer arbitrariness".
The controversy highlights a growing trend in online wagering, known as prediction markets, where individuals can place bets on various outcomes. These platforms have gained popularity in the US and offer binary bets, often pitting yes/no or higher/lower outcomes.
Polymarket's stance has left many feeling disillusioned with the platform, particularly given its regulatory approval in the US just last year. The site does not operate in Great Britain, where similar prediction markets are subject to strict regulations.
As tensions surrounding Venezuela continue to simmer, traders are wondering what other events might be excluded from payout on Polymarket. One thing is clear: for those who bet big, the outcome will have a significant financial impact.
A dramatic shift in odds has left traders on online wager platform Polymarket reeling after the company declared that bets on a US invasion of Venezuela do not qualify for payout. Millions of dollars' worth of wagers have been placed, with many anticipating a swift resolution to the situation.
The bet, which was set at 31 January 2026, appeared to be a long shot, but one anonymous trader took a $30,000 gamble on Maduro's ousting by that date and walked away with a staggering profit of over $436,000. However, after President Trump's forces captured Maduro on Saturday morning, Polymarket clarified that the event did not meet their criteria for a winning bet.
As a result, odds on an invasion plummeted to below 5%. The platform claims that while President Trump mentioned "running" Venezuela, this does not constitute an invasion. However, traders on the site are crying foul, with one user expressing outrage at Polymarket's position, saying it is "sheer arbitrariness".
The controversy highlights a growing trend in online wagering, known as prediction markets, where individuals can place bets on various outcomes. These platforms have gained popularity in the US and offer binary bets, often pitting yes/no or higher/lower outcomes.
Polymarket's stance has left many feeling disillusioned with the platform, particularly given its regulatory approval in the US just last year. The site does not operate in Great Britain, where similar prediction markets are subject to strict regulations.
As tensions surrounding Venezuela continue to simmer, traders are wondering what other events might be excluded from payout on Polymarket. One thing is clear: for those who bet big, the outcome will have a significant financial impact.