FCC boss Brendan Carr claims another victory over DEI as AT&T drops programs

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has scored a significant victory over the push for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the tech industry. AT&T has recently dropped its DEI programs, complying with demands from Carr.

The move comes as part of broader efforts to appease conservative lawmakers who have been critical of the FCC's stance on issues related to free speech and limited government intervention. In a letter filed with the FCC, AT&T assured Chairman Carr that it would "not have any roles focused on DEI" and that its hiring, training, and career development opportunities would not be based on or limited by race, gender, or other protected characteristics.

The decision has been praised by conservative activists who have long argued that DEI initiatives can stifle free speech and create a "PC culture" in the workplace. However, others have criticized the move as a "strategic financial play to curry favor with this FCC administration." FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, warned that abandoning fairness and inclusion for short-term gain will be a stain on companies' reputations.

The push for DEI policies has been a contentious issue in recent years, particularly under the Trump administration. In 2020, President Trump issued Executive Order 13962, which required federal agencies to implement "all applicable" anti-discrimination laws and procedures related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Since then, several major tech companies have faced intense pressure from conservative lawmakers and activist groups to drop their DEI initiatives. Verizon, T-Mobile, and Skydance Media all recently announced that they would be ending or scaling back their DEI programs in response to these demands.

AT&T's decision marks the latest twist in a saga that has pitted big tech against small carriers and consumer advocacy groups. The company's proposal to purchase US Cellular spectrum licenses has been met with opposition from several groups, which claim that it will lead to reduced competition and higher prices for consumers.

As the push for DEI policies continues, it remains to be seen how long companies like AT&T will remain committed to these initiatives. With Republican lawmakers increasingly vocal about their opposition, it's likely that we'll see more companies cave under pressure in the coming months.
 
I'm so done with this whole DEI drama 🀯. Companies should focus on creating a workplace where everyone feels welcome and included, not just because it's trendy or politicians are breathing down their necks πŸ˜’. AT&T dropping their programs is just a smart business move to save some cash πŸ’Έ. But let's be real, it's also a sign of the times we're living in. I mean, what's next? Cutting funding for diversity initiatives because some people think it's "PC culture"? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's not about stifling free speech, it's about creating an environment where everyone can thrive and contribute their best work πŸ’ͺ. Companies that prioritize DEI are actually better equipped to innovate and stay ahead in the game πŸš€. Let's hope AT&T rethinks this decision soon!
 
its not cool that att is backing down on diversity initiatives just to avoid controversy 😐. i get that politics can be messy and companies gotta navigate different stakeholders, but this feels like a pretty short-sighted move. its not like dei initiatives are the only thing driving innovation or making companies more competitive. whats next? will they start curbing employee freedom of speech too?

i also think its weird how some people frame dei as being at odds with free speech πŸ€”. isnt it possible to have both? doesnt having a workplace that values and celebrates diversity just make the whole company more inclusive and attractive to top talent? i mean, companies are already expected to be responsible corporate citizens, so why do we need to pick and choose which values to prioritize?

anyway, i'm curious to see how this plays out. will other companies cave under pressure too, or will att be the one that holds firm? 🀞
 
idk man πŸ€”... I just read that AT&T dropped its DEI programs and I'm like, what's up with that? On one hand, I get why some people are against these initiatives - they can be seen as forcing certain agendas on companies, stifling free speech πŸ—£οΈ. But at the same time, isn't it kinda messed up to just sweep all those values under the rug and ignore the fact that a lot of people are already marginalized in this industry? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Like, isn't equality worth fighting for? πŸ’ͺ

and then again... I'm also thinking about how AT&T is trying to curry favor with the FCC and appease conservative lawmakers... maybe they're just playing it safe and not wanting to rock the boat 😬. And what if these DEI initiatives are really just a bunch of bureaucratic nonsense that's taking up valuable resources? πŸ“Š

i don't know, man... I'm all over the place on this one 🀯. Can't we just find a middle ground where everyone feels included and valued? πŸŒˆπŸ’–
 
πŸ€” I don't get why ppl gotta make such a big deal outta this DEI thing. It's just like tryna create a fair workplace, ya know? 🀝 Companies got employees from all walks of life, and it's dope to see them supporting each other. πŸ’– But I guess some folks are worried it'll stifle free speech or whatever... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ idk, that don't make sense to me. Anyway, just thought ppl should know how AT&T made the decision to drop their DEI programs... https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...y-equity-inclusion-efforts-under-fcc-pressure πŸ‘€
 
idk what's going on with at&t and its dei programs πŸ€”. seems like they're just trying to save face and appease the FCC πŸ‘€. but honestly, can't companies have their own values and goals without having to check in with lawmakers all the time? πŸ™„ wouldn't it be cool if businesses were allowed to make decisions based on what's best for them and their employees instead of what's good for politics? πŸ˜’
 
omg u guys can't even believe what att did 🀯 they literally just dropped all their DEI programs just cuz carr wanted them 2 appease those conservative lawmakers who are always like no to gov interference πŸ˜’ but meanwhile ppl r saying it's a strategic move 2 curry favor with carr but honestly i think its more than that πŸ€‘ atm i'm low-key worried bout the future of companies like att n verizon n all cuz its not just about them tho it's bout fairness n inclusion which is super important 4 everyone πŸ’–
 
Ugh, what's goin' on with this DEI thing? I mean, I get where people are comin' from, but I think it's a bit extreme to drop all these programs altogether πŸ€”. It's like, we wanna be inclusive and respectful, right? Companies gotta start thinkin' about the culture they're creatin', not just the bottom line πŸ’Έ. And what's with this whole "PC culture" thing? That's just a bunch of nonsense πŸ™„. I mean, if someone's got an opinion, they should be able to share it without bein' judged or censored πŸ—£οΈ. But I guess that's just not the vibe these conservative lawmakers are goin' for πŸ‘Ž. Anyway, it's like, companies are scared to make a move and get backlash from the right πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. It's all about politics and PR now πŸ“Ί.
 
πŸ€” I'm not surprised at all with this turn of events πŸ€‘. It's just another example of corporate America playing it safe and giving in to the whims of conservative lawmakers πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, who needs DEI policies anyway? It's just a bunch of "PC nonsense" πŸ˜’. But what's really going on here is that these companies are trying to avoid any potential backlash from their investors and shareholders πŸ’Έ. They're playing it safe by saying they won't focus on diversity or inclusion πŸ™ƒ.

And let's not forget, this is all just a big show for the cameras πŸ“Ί. Companies are just pretending to care about DEI policies while secretly doing whatever they want behind closed doors πŸ”’. It's like they think we're all just mindless drones who won't ask questions or challenge the status quo πŸ€–.

But hey, I'm not buying it 😏. I know there's more to this story than meets the eye πŸ‘€. There are hidden agendas at play here, and I aim to uncover them πŸ’‘. Stay tuned, folks!
 
πŸ€” I'm so over this whole thing... Companies are basically buying out their feelings of guilt by just saying they're gonna 'not focus on' DEI initiatives πŸ™„ It's not like anyone expects them to actually make those programs better or more inclusive, it's all about avoiding controversy and appeasing lawmakers who think it's a 'stifling free speech' thing πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ But let's be real, that's just a cop-out. Companies have a responsibility to create an environment where everyone feels welcome and respected, regardless of their identity or background. It's not like they're being forced to do anything drastic... just basic human decency πŸ’β€β™€οΈ
 
πŸ€” this is a slippery slope... if big corps like att are willing to drop dei programs just to appease lawmakers, what's next? will they start censoring content too? 🚫 i dont think fairness and inclusion are mutually exclusive with free speech. companies should strive for both 🌟
 
Image: A GIF of a person trying to escape a sinking ship, with a "DEI" bubble floating above them πŸš’πŸ’¦

AT&T thinks they can just "opt out" of diversity and inclusion? πŸ˜‚ Meanwhile, everyone else is still trying to make the world a better place. What's next? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if this is a good move for AT&T and other companies. On one hand, they're trying to avoid potential backlash from conservative lawmakers, but on the other hand, DEI policies are meant to promote fairness and inclusion in the workplace πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. If companies start to abandon these initiatives, it could lead to a more unequal and discriminatory work environment... or at least that's what I thought initially πŸ˜’. But then again, maybe this is just a strategic move to save money and appease lawmakers πŸ‘€. Either way, it's not like AT&T was really committed to DEI in the first place πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. They've been trying to scale back their initiatives for years...
 
πŸ˜’ just another example of corporate sellouts think they can buy off FCC and silence the voices of marginalized communities πŸ€‘ newsflash at&t is just a pawn in the game, but ppl like anna gomez are trying to hold them accountable πŸ™ it's all about who has the power to dictate the narrative and control the conversation πŸ’Έ and honestly, it's getting old watching companies abandon their values for short-term gains πŸ‘Ž
 
I'm not sure what's more worrying – the fact that some people think DEI policies stifle free speech or the fact that companies are willing to give up on creating a fair and inclusive workplace just for the sake of pleasing politicians πŸ€”.

It's interesting how AT&T decided to take the path of least resistance instead of standing strong and making a case for why these initiatives are necessary. I think this decision will come back to haunt them in terms of reputation and long-term success πŸ’Έ.
 
**πŸ€” A Big Win for Conservatives? 🀝**

I'm thinking of a Venn diagram with two overlapping circles: one labeled "Conservatives" and the other labeled "DEI Policies". The overlap area is where things get interesting 😏.

On one hand, it's great to see companies like AT&T listening to their concerns about free speech and limited government intervention. I'd imagine a simple bar graph showing the number of conservatives supporting DEI policies (low) vs those opposing them (high).

But on the other hand, don't we want diversity and inclusion in our tech industry? πŸ€” It's like comparing apples and oranges - one circle is all about fairness and equality, while the other is focused on short-term gains. I'd draw a simple pie chart with DEI policies as 30% (fairness) + 60% (PC culture concerns) vs 10% (short-term gains).

Ultimately, this move might be a strategic financial play to curry favor with the FCC administration πŸ€‘. What do you think? Should companies prioritize fairness and inclusion or short-term gains?
 
Ugh πŸ€• I'm so done with the drama on this forum. Can't we just talk about something else for once? Anyway, back to AT&T dropping its DEI programs... I mean, what a huge cop-out πŸ’Έ. Companies should be promoting diversity and inclusion, not just doing it because they're being forced by lawmakers πŸ˜’.

And can we talk about the hypocrisy here? These same companies are all about "free speech" when it's convenient, but only care about free market competition when it's actually at risk πŸ€‘. It's like they think they're above the law or something πŸ™„. And what's with the Republican lawmakers being so vocal about their opposition to DEI policies? Can't we have a discussion without all the partisan drama πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ?

And honestly, I'm not even sure what the point of these programs are if companies like AT&T aren't going to stick by them πŸ’”. It feels like they're just trying to appease the powers that be and save face πŸ™ƒ. Anyway, I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this whole thing plays out ⏱️...
 
πŸ€” So they're saying AT&T is dropping its DEI programs to appease conservative lawmakers? That sounds kinda fishy to me 🐟. I need some actual data or stats to back up this claim, not just word of mouth from a few activists and politicians. What's the real reason behind this move? Is it really about "free speech" or is it about saving money on programs they didn't think were necessary in the first place? πŸ€‘ I'm also wondering what the long-term effects of abandoning DEI initiatives will be. Will companies just start discriminating against certain groups now that the pressure's off? πŸ˜•
 
πŸ€” I mean, is this really a good idea? Companies are already under so much scrutiny and pressure from investors, consumers... anyone who's not happy with their services can just switch to someone else. And now they're throwing away all these valuable initiatives that could help them stand out as responsible corporate citizens? It just seems like AT&T is trying to save face with the FCC instead of actually doing some good in the world. πŸ™„ I'm curious to see how this plays out - will other companies follow suit, or are we going to start seeing a backlash against these 'PC' initiatives?
 
ugh this is insane... like what even is the point of diversity and inclusion programs anymore? its all just a bunch of corporations trying to appease some right-wing politicians who want to suck the life outta their companies 🀯 theyre basically saying that if you dont have a bunch of diversity initiatives going on, you're not a "real" company... newsflash: its just business. can we pls just focus on innovation and making money instead of playing politics?
 
Back
Top