Detroit demolished 27,000 abandoned homes under Duggan as Land Bank inventory dwindles - Detroit Metro Times

Detroit's Demolition Effort Hits a Roadblock: Land Bank Inventory Dwindles Amid Environmental Concerns.

In a milestone of its campaign to eradicate blight in the city, Detroit has demolished nearly 27,000 abandoned houses and sold another 19,000 homes since Mayor Mike Duggan took office in 2014. However, as the city nears the elimination of its vacant housing stock, an ongoing environmental cleanup effort linked to contaminated soil used at some demolition sites threatens to undermine the achievements.

Just over a decade ago, Detroit had an estimated 47,000 abandoned, city-owned houses under the Detroit Land Bank Authority. As of this month, that inventory has been reduced to just 942 homes, according to a final report released by Duggan ahead of the closeout of Proposal N, a voter-approved bond program that funded the second phase of demolitions.

While the city's efforts have undoubtedly contributed to rising property values, with a University of Michigan study finding that Detroit homeowners gained $4.6 billion in home equity between 2014 and 2023, some are now questioning whether the cost of environmental remediation will outweigh the benefits of these initiatives.

A probe into the use of contaminated soil at demolition sites has led to the suspension of several contractors, including Gayanga Co. LLC and Iron Horse of Michigan Inc., which was found to have supplied backfill material that exceeded state residential standards at multiple locations. The city has set aside $15 million in Proposal N closeout funds to address soil remediation, and testing ordered by the city has revealed unacceptable contaminant levels at dozens of sites.

"We will test every single site with suspected contaminated backfill, we will immediately remove any soil found unacceptable, and we will pursue reimbursement from the responsible contractor," Duggan said. However, some are now calling for greater transparency in this process, as well as stricter regulations on environmental remediation efforts.

Despite these challenges, Mayor Duggan remains committed to his campaign against blight in Detroit, citing the success of homeowners who stayed in the city and never left as one of the most satisfying accomplishments of his administration. As the city continues to navigate these complex issues, it will be watching with interest to see how these initiatives are resolved and whether they can be reconciled with a commitment to environmental sustainability.
 
I gotta say, 27k+ houses demolished is awesome on paper, but have you considered the human cost? I mean, what about all those families that got displaced, like, literally torn out of their homes? Detroit's been talking about gentrification for years, and now they're just pushing it under the rug. Environmental concerns are valid, no doubt, but we gotta think about the people affected by these 'blight' removal efforts 🤔.

And let's not forget, $15 million is a drop in the bucket compared to the real costs of displacement, healthcare, and mental health issues for those families. We need stricter regulations on environmental remediation, yes, but also transparency and accountability when it comes to displacing communities. Detroit's making progress, but it's time to dig deeper and think about the long-term consequences of these initiatives 💸
 
🤔 Detroit's progress is like, really inspiring, you know? Eradicating blight in the city is huge! But now that their goal is almost done, I'm kinda worried about what's gonna happen next 🤷‍♀️. Like, they're making so much money from selling homes, but at what cost? The environmental cleanup is a big deal and it's not like they can just ignore it 🔒.

I mean, the fact that some contractors got suspended and the city has to set aside $15 million for remediation is already a major bummer 💸. But if they don't address this issue properly, it could mess up all the progress they made in other areas 🤦‍♀️. And what about the homeowners who stayed in the city? Are they gonna be protected from any potential contamination effects? 🌎

The city needs to figure out a way to balance their goals with environmental sustainability 💪. It's not like they can just ignore the problem and hope it goes away 🔮. They need to find a solution that works for everyone, including the environment 🌿.
 
I think this is just another example of how we're too quick to judge progress without giving people the time and resources they need 🤔. I mean, 27,000 homes demolished? That's still a lot of blight in my books. And let's not forget that all these homes were basically just sitting there, taking up space and being eyesores for years. So, yeah, maybe we should be grateful the city took action. 🙃 But at the same time, I can see why some people are worried about the environmental implications. It's like, we're trying to clean up a mess, but in the process, we might create another one. Let's just hope they figure out how to make it work and that everyone comes out on top 💪
 
I'm kinda worried about what's happening in Detroit 🤔. On one hand, I get why you'd want to tear down all those abandoned houses - it's like, totally creepy and stuff. But now that the city's almost done, they're running into problems with contaminated soil... 15 million bucks set aside for cleaning up? That's a lot of cash 💸. I hope they can figure out what's going on and fix it without hurting all the progress they've made.
 
🤔 "The biggest risk is not taking any risk... In a world that's changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks." 🚀 - Mark Zuckerberg 💡
 
can you believe detroit has come so far in tearing down those abandoned houses but now they're worried about the soil contamination from all that demolition work 🤯💔 it's like they didn't think this through, i guess. $4.6 billion gain in home equity is a big deal, but if the city can't even clean up after itself, what's the point? 🚮😕

it's good to see mayor duggan taking responsibility for the mess, but i wish there was more transparency from the start. why didn't they test the soil sooner? how much are these contractors getting paid to just ignore environmental standards? 💸🤷‍♂️

anyway, i'm all for a city trying to revamp itself, but you can't just sweep problems under the rug and expect everything to be okay. detroit needs to prioritize sustainability and transparency if they want to make real progress 🌱💚
 
Ugh, I'm so frustrated when I hear about all this waste 🤦‍♂️. They're doing such a great job of getting rid of those abandoned houses, but now the city is dealing with contaminated soil issues? It's like they're just kicking the can down the road 📦. I mean, I get that environmental remediation is important, but come on, can't we do better than this? We should be setting a good example for other cities to follow, not just trying to cover our tracks 💔. And what's up with all these contractors getting suspended? That's not right 🤬. The city needs to step up and take responsibility for their actions 👊. Let's hope they can get this sorted out ASAP ⏱️.
 
Back
Top