Detroit Department of Transportation officials have been found to have abused their authority by shielding employees from disciplinary action for disrupting bus service due to a "romantic interaction" between two colleagues. According to an investigation by the Detroit Office of Inspector General, Senior Transportation Service Inspector Andre Reece and bus driver Dayna Ruff engaged in "inappropriate intimate behavior," falsely reported mechanical problems, and left a bus running and unattended, causing major service delays.
The investigation found that Reece and Ruff's actions resulted in a 115-minute disruption to services and a waste of city resources on May 6. Just two weeks later, the pair again met repeatedly along Ruff's route and abandoned a running bus, prompting additional delays. Despite classifying this behavior as a Class IV offense, which is the most serious category under DDOT's disciplinary system, Superintendent of Operations Howard Bragg III issued only five-day suspensions.
The OIG found that Bragg failed to conduct a proper investigation before issuing discipline, despite having access to surveillance video that documented the misconduct. The report also concluded that Reece and Ruff failed to disclose their romantic relationship, as required by a city executive order governing supervisor-subordinate relationships, and that DDOT and human resources officials failed to properly review or complete the required disclosure forms.
The investigation found broader systemic problems inside DDOT, concluding that "disciplinary practices employed by DDOT's Operations Management Team are not compliant or consistent with the disciplinary policies mandated by the 2008 DDOT Employee Handbook." This is particularly troubling in a city like Detroit, where public transportation plays a critical role for residents who rely heavily on buses to get to work, school, medical appointments, and childcare.
The OIG recommended additional discipline for Reece and Ruff, punishment for Bragg and Assistant Director of Operations Andre Mallett, and significant reforms to ensure future investigations are thorough, transparent, and consistent with written policy. The report concluded that DDOT should create a system of procedures to allow more oversight over the review and issuing of discipline to ensure that discipline is proportionate to the offense and all policies are followed.
The lenient discipline issued by Bragg and Mallett has raised questions about accountability within the department, particularly in light of the city's reliance on public transportation. The OIG's findings have significant implications for the future of DDOT, highlighting the need for reforms that prioritize transparency, consistency, and oversight to ensure that public trust is maintained.
The investigation found that Reece and Ruff's actions resulted in a 115-minute disruption to services and a waste of city resources on May 6. Just two weeks later, the pair again met repeatedly along Ruff's route and abandoned a running bus, prompting additional delays. Despite classifying this behavior as a Class IV offense, which is the most serious category under DDOT's disciplinary system, Superintendent of Operations Howard Bragg III issued only five-day suspensions.
The OIG found that Bragg failed to conduct a proper investigation before issuing discipline, despite having access to surveillance video that documented the misconduct. The report also concluded that Reece and Ruff failed to disclose their romantic relationship, as required by a city executive order governing supervisor-subordinate relationships, and that DDOT and human resources officials failed to properly review or complete the required disclosure forms.
The investigation found broader systemic problems inside DDOT, concluding that "disciplinary practices employed by DDOT's Operations Management Team are not compliant or consistent with the disciplinary policies mandated by the 2008 DDOT Employee Handbook." This is particularly troubling in a city like Detroit, where public transportation plays a critical role for residents who rely heavily on buses to get to work, school, medical appointments, and childcare.
The OIG recommended additional discipline for Reece and Ruff, punishment for Bragg and Assistant Director of Operations Andre Mallett, and significant reforms to ensure future investigations are thorough, transparent, and consistent with written policy. The report concluded that DDOT should create a system of procedures to allow more oversight over the review and issuing of discipline to ensure that discipline is proportionate to the offense and all policies are followed.
The lenient discipline issued by Bragg and Mallett has raised questions about accountability within the department, particularly in light of the city's reliance on public transportation. The OIG's findings have significant implications for the future of DDOT, highlighting the need for reforms that prioritize transparency, consistency, and oversight to ensure that public trust is maintained.