Coroners' reports on preventing future deaths should be law.
A recent study has revealed that coroners' prevention of future deaths (PFD) reports are consistently ignored by the health trusts they investigate. This lack of enforcement is staggering, especially considering that a PFD report is issued only when serious systemic failings and inaction by the trust have led to tragedy.
For Christine and Francis Saunders, who wrote to our paper last week, a PFD report was a lifeline after their daughter Juliet's avoidable death at just 25 years old. The coroner's investigation exposed a series of critical errors and neglect, and it is shocking that the health trust refused to implement the eight recommendations set out in the report.
What is equally disturbing is the fact that there is no legal enforcement of these measures. This means that trusts can simply dismiss or ignore PFD reports without facing any consequences for their failure to act on them.
The impact of this lack of enforcement is stark. People with learning disabilities are disproportionately affected by avoidable deaths, with nearly double the death rate compared to the general population. The fact that a trust claimed that Juliet's non-verbal nature made her hard to treat is particularly egregious, and raises serious questions about the value placed on vulnerable patients.
The Saundes' experience highlights the need for tougher measures to ensure that PFD reports are taken seriously. Legally enforcing these reports would help prevent further tragedies and give families like theirs a measure of closure. It's time for politicians and regulators to take action and make sure that trusts are held accountable for their actions.
A recent study has revealed that coroners' prevention of future deaths (PFD) reports are consistently ignored by the health trusts they investigate. This lack of enforcement is staggering, especially considering that a PFD report is issued only when serious systemic failings and inaction by the trust have led to tragedy.
For Christine and Francis Saunders, who wrote to our paper last week, a PFD report was a lifeline after their daughter Juliet's avoidable death at just 25 years old. The coroner's investigation exposed a series of critical errors and neglect, and it is shocking that the health trust refused to implement the eight recommendations set out in the report.
What is equally disturbing is the fact that there is no legal enforcement of these measures. This means that trusts can simply dismiss or ignore PFD reports without facing any consequences for their failure to act on them.
The impact of this lack of enforcement is stark. People with learning disabilities are disproportionately affected by avoidable deaths, with nearly double the death rate compared to the general population. The fact that a trust claimed that Juliet's non-verbal nature made her hard to treat is particularly egregious, and raises serious questions about the value placed on vulnerable patients.
The Saundes' experience highlights the need for tougher measures to ensure that PFD reports are taken seriously. Legally enforcing these reports would help prevent further tragedies and give families like theirs a measure of closure. It's time for politicians and regulators to take action and make sure that trusts are held accountable for their actions.