Climate talks stall as critics say the UN summit is broken
The 30th edition of the UN climate negotiations, Cop30, is taking place in Belém, Brazil, a city that hosted the first Earth summit where the global fight for the climate began. Hopes were high that this edition could be a turning point in the fight against climate breakdown, but some say it's just another example of the talks' lack of progress.
Developing countries have been left feeling frustrated and betrayed by previous climate summits, with many accusing them of being dominated by rich nations and fossil fuel companies. The scale of lobbying operations carried out by these groups is staggering, with nearly 2,500 representatives attending Cop28 alone - more than the combined delegations of many vulnerable nations.
Critics argue that the UN process has become mired in misinformation and bad faith actors, and that the talks are no longer effective in securing a livable future. The process is seen as too complex, with poorer countries struggling to engage due to barriers such as language and logistics.
At the heart of the problem is what many see as a fundamental flaw in the system - power imbalances between rich and poor nations. As one critic put it, "It's not the structure of the Cop that is the problem; it's power which is the problem." The issue goes beyond climate change itself, representing a much larger struggle for justice in the world.
The negotiations are often dominated by the interests of powerful nations such as the US and Europe, leaving vulnerable countries like Bolivia feeling ignored. When decisions are made without their input or consent, it's often in their favor - rather than the will of those who need it most.
Despite some progress on climate issues, critics say that Cop30 is failing to address the urgent need for action. Emissions continue to rise, and many see the summit as a missed opportunity to turn promises into performance. As one expert noted, "The Cop process has delivered what it was designed for: diplomacy and consensus - but it's failing to deliver on ambition."
The 30th edition of the UN climate negotiations, Cop30, is taking place in Belém, Brazil, a city that hosted the first Earth summit where the global fight for the climate began. Hopes were high that this edition could be a turning point in the fight against climate breakdown, but some say it's just another example of the talks' lack of progress.
Developing countries have been left feeling frustrated and betrayed by previous climate summits, with many accusing them of being dominated by rich nations and fossil fuel companies. The scale of lobbying operations carried out by these groups is staggering, with nearly 2,500 representatives attending Cop28 alone - more than the combined delegations of many vulnerable nations.
Critics argue that the UN process has become mired in misinformation and bad faith actors, and that the talks are no longer effective in securing a livable future. The process is seen as too complex, with poorer countries struggling to engage due to barriers such as language and logistics.
At the heart of the problem is what many see as a fundamental flaw in the system - power imbalances between rich and poor nations. As one critic put it, "It's not the structure of the Cop that is the problem; it's power which is the problem." The issue goes beyond climate change itself, representing a much larger struggle for justice in the world.
The negotiations are often dominated by the interests of powerful nations such as the US and Europe, leaving vulnerable countries like Bolivia feeling ignored. When decisions are made without their input or consent, it's often in their favor - rather than the will of those who need it most.
Despite some progress on climate issues, critics say that Cop30 is failing to address the urgent need for action. Emissions continue to rise, and many see the summit as a missed opportunity to turn promises into performance. As one expert noted, "The Cop process has delivered what it was designed for: diplomacy and consensus - but it's failing to deliver on ambition."