FIFA Under Pressure: Can a World Cup Boycott Really Make a Difference?
German football federation vice-president Oke Göttlich has called for a serious discussion about boycotting the 2026 World Cup, citing potential threats and moral centers. However, it remains to be seen whether such a move will have any tangible impact.
The idea of a boycott gained momentum after Sepp Blatter, FIFA's former president, endorsed comments urging teams to "avoid the United States." The move was sparked by concerns over Donald Trump's policies, including his administration's actions in Venezuela and his travel bans. Some might see this as an opportunity for soccer authorities to take a stand against the US government.
Yet, it is uncertain whether such a boycott will be effective. The question is who would really be punished – not the Trump administration, which seems unlikely to care about saving the World Cup from a potential boycott. The oligarch class supporting Trump might also see little consequence, as their interests lie elsewhere.
FIFA stands to lose revenue from broadcast rights and sponsorships if teams withdraw from the tournament. However, it has shown an ability to adapt in the past. The organization could potentially mitigate any losses by shifting its focus or altering its business model.
In the long run, the most significant impact would be borne by the boycotting teams and their fans, who would miss out on participating in or watching a World Cup with their country represented. Local workers and tourism supporters also stand to lose from such an action.
It is worth noting that previous boycotts have had limited success. The 1980 Summer Games boycott led to no change in the Soviet Union's policies, but it did affect the athletes who participated in the boycotted Olympics. In contrast, African countries successfully used a boycott of the 1966 World Cup as leverage for increased representation.
In light of this, holding up the Olympic boycotts as an example of an effective political tool is misguided. A similar approach might not yield the desired results this time around either.
So what can be done? For starters, it would be more effective to engage in direct protest through attendance at rallies or demonstrations rather than simply absenting oneself from a World Cup match. By participating and using one's voice, individuals may be able to influence change without sacrificing their love for the game.
Ultimately, there is no easy solution. However, if soccer authorities are determined to use their collective influence as a means of making an impact on the global stage, perhaps they could focus on building a more inclusive and equitable environment – rather than taking a step back from the action altogether.
German football federation vice-president Oke Göttlich has called for a serious discussion about boycotting the 2026 World Cup, citing potential threats and moral centers. However, it remains to be seen whether such a move will have any tangible impact.
The idea of a boycott gained momentum after Sepp Blatter, FIFA's former president, endorsed comments urging teams to "avoid the United States." The move was sparked by concerns over Donald Trump's policies, including his administration's actions in Venezuela and his travel bans. Some might see this as an opportunity for soccer authorities to take a stand against the US government.
Yet, it is uncertain whether such a boycott will be effective. The question is who would really be punished – not the Trump administration, which seems unlikely to care about saving the World Cup from a potential boycott. The oligarch class supporting Trump might also see little consequence, as their interests lie elsewhere.
FIFA stands to lose revenue from broadcast rights and sponsorships if teams withdraw from the tournament. However, it has shown an ability to adapt in the past. The organization could potentially mitigate any losses by shifting its focus or altering its business model.
In the long run, the most significant impact would be borne by the boycotting teams and their fans, who would miss out on participating in or watching a World Cup with their country represented. Local workers and tourism supporters also stand to lose from such an action.
It is worth noting that previous boycotts have had limited success. The 1980 Summer Games boycott led to no change in the Soviet Union's policies, but it did affect the athletes who participated in the boycotted Olympics. In contrast, African countries successfully used a boycott of the 1966 World Cup as leverage for increased representation.
In light of this, holding up the Olympic boycotts as an example of an effective political tool is misguided. A similar approach might not yield the desired results this time around either.
So what can be done? For starters, it would be more effective to engage in direct protest through attendance at rallies or demonstrations rather than simply absenting oneself from a World Cup match. By participating and using one's voice, individuals may be able to influence change without sacrificing their love for the game.
Ultimately, there is no easy solution. However, if soccer authorities are determined to use their collective influence as a means of making an impact on the global stage, perhaps they could focus on building a more inclusive and equitable environment – rather than taking a step back from the action altogether.
FIFA is all about the Benjamins and they'd just find a way to make it happen. The thing is, what's the end goal here? Do you really think boycotting the World Cup is gonna change Trump's mind or get him to care about some poor soccer team from somewhere? It's like, come on guys, get your priorities straight 
. I mean, it's great that people are passionate about standing up against Trump's policies, but boycotting the tournament might just end up hurting more people than it helps 
. Think about all those fans who would miss out on the games, local workers who rely on tourism, and FIFA itself, which would lose revenue 
. It's not like Trump is going to be too bothered by a few teams dropping out of the tournament 
.
. And let's be real, most people are just going to tune in anyway, Trump or no Trump 
.
rather than taking a knee 
. Let's get behind the values of fairness, respect, and equality – that's what this beautiful game is all about 
!
. what really needs to change is the power dynamic between those in charge and those who have been marginalized for so long 
... if soccer authorities want to use their influence to bring about real change, they need to be more proactive in amplifying the voices of underrepresented communities 
. The real victims would be those teams and fans who'd miss out on the tournament. And let's be honest, FIFA's got some serious cash to burn 
. I don't think this would work the same way now.
. Attend rallies, show your support... that's how you can make a difference without giving up on your love for the game 
. Plus, we've seen these kinds of boycotts before and they never really seem to do much 
. It's all about speaking out against things that aren't right. Maybe instead of boycotting, we should just try to organize some kind of game-day protest or something... where people can still watch the matches but also show their support for social justice causes 
. That way, we get to keep playing our favorite sport while still making a difference 
.
. And that's what we should be focusing on here too. Instead of boycotting the World Cup, maybe we should be organizing rallies and demonstrations to show our disapproval of Trump's policies 
. And if that means showing up at a rally or two instead of cheering from the sidelines, then so be it 
. At least we'd know our voices are being heard 
? Like, I get it, Trump's got some issues, but let's not forget we're talking about soccer here... and lots of people are gonna be super disappointed if their team doesn't show up. But hey, at least the oligarchs who support him won't be too bothered by a little lost revenue 
. I mean, we've had boycotts before and they didn't exactly lead to the world changing (see: 1980 Summer Games). So yeah, let's not hold up those Olympics as an example of success... unless you want to argue that athletes who boycotted were basically superheroes with superpowers 
. And don't even get me started on the African countries who used a boycott as leverage...that was like, a whole different game 
.
.
. but maybe instead of boycotting, we should be using our voices to create change from within? like, organizing protests or rallies around the games 
.
. I mean, what's a little revenue loss in the grand scheme of things compared to being able to say "we stood up for our values"? And let's be real, boycotting the US isn't gonna make a difference - it's just gonna hurt innocent people who love football as much as we do 
teams & fans are already losing out on some awesome games & experiences. plus, if we're talking about making a statement, maybe we should be supporting the players who are actually speaking out against these policies, you know? 
come on guys FIFA is always gonna be under pressure, that's just how it is 
teams are already boycotting games for different reasons, maybe we can learn from each other instead of trying to dictate what's best for everyone 
.
Local workers and tourists are gonna feel the pinch too, so I don't see how this boycott thingy will even help... 
️
FIFA's gonna make money off it either way. but i do think some teams and fans are genuinely worried about trump's policies