A new investigation by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., has shed light on a disturbing practice within the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). It appears that the TSA relied heavily on a controversial "counter-extremism" group called George Washington University's Program on Extremism to put names on a secret watchlist.
The program, which is about 10 years old, uses academic research to identify potential extremists and domestic threats. However, some Arab and Muslim advocacy groups have expressed concerns that the program's methods may be too broad and could lead to innocent people being targeted.
According to internal records, the government used Program on Extremism research to add names to TSA watchlists. Sen. Paul is exploring how this happened and has asked George Washington University for records that would help determine whether its researchers were involved in nominating travelers for surveillance.
The investigation highlights concerns about the effectiveness of the TSA's watchlisting system, which spans multiple agencies and includes hundreds of thousands of names in different databases. Democrats and left-leaning civil liberties groups have long been vocal about reforms to the system, citing issues with due process and transparency.
Some critics argue that the program has a partisan bias against Arab and Muslim communities, which is reinforced by its funding from the Department of Homeland Security. This has led to accusations that the program's methods are unseemly for government and that it unfairly targets law-abiding Americans.
The incident raises questions about accountability within the TSA and whether government agencies are following due process when identifying potential security threats. As one advocacy group stated, "If the TSA used that group's reports as the only 'evidence,' it's a scandal."
This investigation serves as a reminder of the need for greater oversight and accountability in government agencies tasked with national security issues.
The program, which is about 10 years old, uses academic research to identify potential extremists and domestic threats. However, some Arab and Muslim advocacy groups have expressed concerns that the program's methods may be too broad and could lead to innocent people being targeted.
According to internal records, the government used Program on Extremism research to add names to TSA watchlists. Sen. Paul is exploring how this happened and has asked George Washington University for records that would help determine whether its researchers were involved in nominating travelers for surveillance.
The investigation highlights concerns about the effectiveness of the TSA's watchlisting system, which spans multiple agencies and includes hundreds of thousands of names in different databases. Democrats and left-leaning civil liberties groups have long been vocal about reforms to the system, citing issues with due process and transparency.
Some critics argue that the program has a partisan bias against Arab and Muslim communities, which is reinforced by its funding from the Department of Homeland Security. This has led to accusations that the program's methods are unseemly for government and that it unfairly targets law-abiding Americans.
The incident raises questions about accountability within the TSA and whether government agencies are following due process when identifying potential security threats. As one advocacy group stated, "If the TSA used that group's reports as the only 'evidence,' it's a scandal."
This investigation serves as a reminder of the need for greater oversight and accountability in government agencies tasked with national security issues.