Gaza Ceasefire: A Holding Pattern Before War Returns?
A fragile ceasefire has been in place since October 10, with over 100 people killed in recent airstrikes. However, the arrangement is far from secure, and a return to violence is increasingly likely.
The latest round of violence was sparked by Hamas fire against Israeli forces in Rafah, an area still under Israeli control. Israel responded with strikes on Gaza City and Khan Younis, highlighting the lack of enforcement mechanisms and determination among parties to respect the ceasefire.
The 20-point plan introduced by Donald Trump's administration is largely undeveloped, offering no clear timeline or credible means of verification. The plan remains a holding pattern, with each side interpreting violations to suit its own interests.
Gaza's humanitarian situation continues to deteriorate, with shortages of food, water, and medicine, while aid convoys face intermittent blockages. The population is already traumatized from two years of war, and the infrastructure in ruins.
The Trump administration's efforts to sustain the truce have been positive but insufficient. High-level visits and deployment of troops to a monitoring centre have done little to prevent renewed cycles of conflict.
Without mechanisms to prevent violations or impose consequences, the truce remains vulnerable to collapse from any single provocation. The fundamental flaws in Trump's plan are clear – it treats symptoms rather than addressing the root problems.
For the ceasefire to evolve into a sustainable framework, international reinforcement is needed. Independent monitoring, clear timelines for reconstruction and withdrawal, and binding guarantees for security and humanitarian access must be put in place. Without these elements, the situation will continue to lurch between cycles of calm and violence, eventually giving way to another round of war.
The lack of accountability and authority among monitoring centres means that the truce remains at risk. The influence of Egypt and Qatar is waning amid this uncertainty, leaving a power vacuum that could be filled by other actors with competing interests.
Ultimately, the ceasefire in Gaza is not a meaningful peace plan but a temporary holding pattern through which both sides prepare for the next confrontation. It is imperative to address the underlying issues driving the conflict and work towards a more sustainable solution.
A fragile ceasefire has been in place since October 10, with over 100 people killed in recent airstrikes. However, the arrangement is far from secure, and a return to violence is increasingly likely.
The latest round of violence was sparked by Hamas fire against Israeli forces in Rafah, an area still under Israeli control. Israel responded with strikes on Gaza City and Khan Younis, highlighting the lack of enforcement mechanisms and determination among parties to respect the ceasefire.
The 20-point plan introduced by Donald Trump's administration is largely undeveloped, offering no clear timeline or credible means of verification. The plan remains a holding pattern, with each side interpreting violations to suit its own interests.
Gaza's humanitarian situation continues to deteriorate, with shortages of food, water, and medicine, while aid convoys face intermittent blockages. The population is already traumatized from two years of war, and the infrastructure in ruins.
The Trump administration's efforts to sustain the truce have been positive but insufficient. High-level visits and deployment of troops to a monitoring centre have done little to prevent renewed cycles of conflict.
Without mechanisms to prevent violations or impose consequences, the truce remains vulnerable to collapse from any single provocation. The fundamental flaws in Trump's plan are clear – it treats symptoms rather than addressing the root problems.
For the ceasefire to evolve into a sustainable framework, international reinforcement is needed. Independent monitoring, clear timelines for reconstruction and withdrawal, and binding guarantees for security and humanitarian access must be put in place. Without these elements, the situation will continue to lurch between cycles of calm and violence, eventually giving way to another round of war.
The lack of accountability and authority among monitoring centres means that the truce remains at risk. The influence of Egypt and Qatar is waning amid this uncertainty, leaving a power vacuum that could be filled by other actors with competing interests.
Ultimately, the ceasefire in Gaza is not a meaningful peace plan but a temporary holding pattern through which both sides prepare for the next confrontation. It is imperative to address the underlying issues driving the conflict and work towards a more sustainable solution.